This morning there was a joke in the newspaper about the Chinese overtaking the Americans. Chinese kids chuckling over having Americans working for them in 2030. “Why do great nations fail?”, the teacher asked. “It happens because they turn their back on the things that make them great.”
Non-violence, honesty and pride made India great. Today we seem to have lost all three. Our leaders see commonwealth games as a way to make a quick buck, our military is building personal houses worth millions on public land, but for a moment stop blaming them. Pause to think about a common man on the street and what example he is setting for his teenage kid. Is he teaching them these values? Are schools worried about making good humans, or are busy creating mark getting machines? Mr.Sibal this is what I would call a reform.
Are these values even relevant today? People will argue both ways and its getting harder by the day to hold ground on this value school of thought. I am convinced though that this is the only way to make India truly great. Each person needs to be his own watchdog. Not easy, but not impossible.
During independence a great role was played by our songwriters. That is another community that has lost its purpose. However, as I said let values begin at home then blame others.
Going back to our priceless scriptures will make it easier for us to achieve this. I want to end with this beautiful song:
So, India’s Got Talent Season 2 got it wrong. The best team did not win. What happened? The rule said judges and votes will get equal (50%) weightage. However its apparent to any Tom, Dick or Harry that the final winners were influenced much more by votes, and to a lesser extent by the judges’ scores.
I did not find any official details on what mathematics was behind the final result. However, my guess is votes were converted into scores (using percentiles for example), and averaged with judges’ scores. This would then yield a result similar to what we got, because judge scores were in the range 23 to 30, whereas prorated vote scores would be in the 0 to 30 range (might not start at zero, but the point is, it would start very low). So, while the worst performer as per judges got a score of 23, the worst voter got a very low score, say 10.
I have written about normalization before. I believe the use of this technique would have yielded more fair results. Normalization brings a set of values to a common mean, and a common standard deviation. Below is a comparison – I have taken guesses on how many votes each contestant received. First, prorating:
Voting score prorata
Manas Kumar Sahu
Next, with the use of normalization:
Nor Judges score
Nor voting score
Manas Kumar Sahu
Several improvements can be seen: Fictitious group has moved deservingly up; Teji Toko has moved down; Acroduo has moved upwards etc. Note again that the number of votes is just a guess (educated one, keeping relative popularities in mind). However, the point is, that with normalization being added to the calculation procedure the same number of votes can bring about a more fair result.